<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Any-Space-Whatever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com</link>
	<description>Neither Here Nor There</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spinoza on Falsity</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza-on-falsity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza-on-falsity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to most philosophy, which struggles to arrive at truth and yield access to true ideas, Spinoza’s epistemological conundrum is how to arrive at falsity and produce false ideas. Because his theory of knowledge is inextricably linked to his ontology, because modal ideas are God’s ideas (by 1P15), and because all God’s ideas are true [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza-on-falsity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinoza’s Panpsychism</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza%e2%80%99s-panpsychism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza%e2%80%99s-panpsychism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baruch Spinoza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is to be understood here concerning the stone should be understood concerning any singular thing whatever, no matter how composite it is, and capable of doing a great many things: that each thing is necessarily determined by some external cause to exist and produce effects in a certain and determinate way.[1] &#160; Panpsychism, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinoza%e2%80%99s-panpsychism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinoza&#8217;s Two Existences</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinozas-two-existences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinozas-two-existences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baruch Spinoza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gottfried Leibniz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prima facie, proposition 2P7 in Spinoza’s Ethics presents the counter-intuitive claim that there can be no ideas without extended objects accompanying them. That is, ideas cannot exist without correlative bodies. However, Spinoza offers 2P8 to address the possibility of singular things that do not exist, while preserving his mind-body parallelism. 2P8 states: The ideas of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spinozas-two-existences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Black Box in the White Cube: Lyotard&#8217;s Les Immatériaux as Machinic Theater</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/the-black-box-in-the-white-cube-lyotards-les-immateriaux-as-machinic-theater/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/the-black-box-in-the-white-cube-lyotards-les-immateriaux-as-machinic-theater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Stiegler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilbert Simondon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Burnham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Francois Lyotard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1960s and 1970s mark the first time contemporary art opposed modernist art. Formalist strategies that privileged the art object were displaced by discursive, administrative and conceptual approaches that emphasized relationships, and connoisseurship gave way to the demands of the growing research-industrial complex. The concept of creativity partially shifted from a traditional craft function to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/the-black-box-in-the-white-cube-lyotards-les-immateriaux-as-machinic-theater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borromini&#8217;s Bricks: Matters of Immanence in the Roman Oratory</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/borromini%e2%80%99s-bricks-matters-of-immanence-in-the-roman-oratory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/borromini%e2%80%99s-bricks-matters-of-immanence-in-the-roman-oratory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred North Whitehead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Massumi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francesco Borromini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henri Bergson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinoza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; And if you think of Brick, for instance, and you say to Brick, &#8220;What do you want Brick?&#8221; And Brick says to you, &#8220;I like an Arch.&#8221; &#8211; Louis Kahn [1]  A concept is a brick. It can be used to build the courthouse of reason. Or it can be thrown through the window. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/borromini%e2%80%99s-bricks-matters-of-immanence-in-the-roman-oratory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tearing Real Images from Clichés: Edward Burtynsky’s Industrial Landscapes</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/tearing-real-images-from-cliches-edward-burtynsky%e2%80%99s-industrial-landscapes-as-any-space-whatever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/tearing-real-images-from-cliches-edward-burtynsky%e2%80%99s-industrial-landscapes-as-any-space-whatever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfred North Whitehead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruno Latour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Burtynsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Grosz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerhard Richter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Fried]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Barthes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosalind Krauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy O'Sullivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such a voyage does not necessarily imply great movements in extension; it becomes immobile, in a room and on a body without organs—an intensive voyage that undoes all the lands for the benefit of the one it is creating. (Deleuze and Guattari 1983: 319) &#160; Edward Burtynsky’s manufactured landscapes – large-format, photographic compositions of industrially-transformed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/tearing-real-images-from-cliches-edward-burtynsky%e2%80%99s-industrial-landscapes-as-any-space-whatever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Stirling and the Post-War Crisis of Movement:  An Architectural Model of the Smooth and the Striated</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/james-stirling-and-the-post-war-crisis-of-movement-an-architectural-model-of-the-smooth-and-the-striated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/james-stirling-and-the-post-war-crisis-of-movement-an-architectural-model-of-the-smooth-and-the-striated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Massumi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fredric Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Simmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Stirling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manfredo Tafuri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Heidegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siegfried Kracauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Benjamin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze transitions between the two volumes of his cinema project by identifying a crisis of movement in post-War cultural and aesthetic practices. As film liberates itself from causal logic and linear displacements, introducing a differential subjectivity to replace static identity, space and time are (re)conceptualized to accommodate incompossible worlds. In establishing these late modern [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/james-stirling-and-the-post-war-crisis-of-movement-an-architectural-model-of-the-smooth-and-the-striated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spaces in Becoming: Jacques Rancière and Pedro Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-jacques-ranciere-and-pedro-costa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-jacques-ranciere-and-pedro-costa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Ranciere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedro Costa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In The Emancipated Spectator, Jacques Rancière challenges traditional theatrical and conceptual binaries separating spectator and actor, active and passive, seeing and knowing, experience and thought, action and reaction, acting and thinking, teaching and learning. Where Brecht and Artaud, despite their differences, assume a pre-constituted subject to be molded, challenged and incorporated within discourses, Rancière assumes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-jacques-ranciere-and-pedro-costa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the Metal and in the Flesh:  The Materiality and Individuation of Information through Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/in-the-metal-and-in-the-flesh-the-materiality-and-individuation-of-information-through-architecture-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/in-the-metal-and-in-the-flesh-the-materiality-and-individuation-of-information-through-architecture-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 19:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Stiegler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cedric Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybernetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilbert Simondon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Pask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The order and connection of ideas is the same as the order and connection of things.[1] - Baruch Spinoza Thoughts in the concrete are made of the same stuff as things are.[2] - William James (1912) In the decades immediately following the Second World War, architectural practice and spatial theory experienced a crisis of legitimacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/in-the-metal-and-in-the-flesh-the-materiality-and-individuation-of-information-through-architecture-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spaces in Becoming: Heterotopias, the Smooth and the Striated)</title>
		<link>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-heterotopias-the-smooth-and-the-striated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-heterotopias-the-smooth-and-the-striated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Satter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heterotopias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel de Certeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Plateau 14 of A Thousand Plateaus, dated 1440 and titled “The Smooth and the Striated,” Deleuze and Guattari posit two types of space – the smooth and the striated – which act as processes that resist a strict binary or dialectic and “exist only in mixture” (474), each one continually being translated and transversed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anyspacewhatever.com/spaces-in-becoming-heterotopias-the-smooth-and-the-striated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

